Designing student build teams, for Reclaim Open 2025

For several years, I’ve been assigning collaborative assignments to small groups of students where each member of the team has a common role and unique role. The class where I use this model most explicitly, WRIT 3152: Digital Community Engagement, has become a service learning class in which students serve as digital strategy consultants for community partners. (I teach a second version of the class in the spring months that focuses on something completely different.) While the class is part of our Professional Writing program in the English Department, it draws on an interdisciplinary approach to teaching the web that involves computer science, marketing, design, and organizational leadership. I enjoy the fact that students can chart their way through the course gaining experience in different roles but on a unique learning path from other students.

I learned the term “build team” from 48in48, a non profit organization in Atlanta that schedules several hackathons per year in which volunteers build free websites for 48 other non profits in 48 hours. 48in48 structures its volunteers (mostly people in the tech industry) into build teams where team members serve as either the project manager, content developer, WordPress designer, or UI/UX specialist. I’ve adapted these roles to the build team concept in my class. Sometimes the roles change to highlight different skills, but typically team members have the option to serve as a project manager, a researcher, a designer, or an editor, the understanding that everyone on the team is also a writer. I’ll offer a breakdown of these roles here and some things that I’ve learned that help students in this environment transition from hating “group work” to learning the concrete skills of collaboration.

Project management: Organizing a team, facilitating conversation, steering a group toward consensus, and keeping people accountable with deadlines — all of these are unique skills that I find some English and Communications majors in my class have in abundance. Sometimes, they have not been invited to use them in our classes. When I give a student the PM role, I am telling them that I have confidence in their ability to lead and assist.

Researcher: In a web-based project, everything is research and curiosity. The researcher on a team should be the person with the license to go down every rabbit hole and gather the most eclectic sources. I stress to students that the researcher job is one that someone can too easily “pretend” to be working, so I always want researchers coming back to their team with citations, annotations, and lists of sources that are beyond what the team needs (so that writers can choose from a wide range of material).

Designer: In my teams, this is the “WordPress” person, and I want to see them learn something new: apply a new theme or plug in, use a new design element, embed media in a new and interesting way. The designer is the person that collects all of the text, image, and web media in order to build the deliverable (a report, a white paper, etc.) to assignment specifications.

Editor: Someone always needs to be the last set of eyes. The best editors can focus on both language and functionality in a finished project. I always prefer an editor to working on text that they did not originate so that the omissions are gaps are clearer. That also means that, because the editor is also a writer, that someone else will need to edit their work.

Other things I have learned constructing, dissolving, encouraging, and sometimes rehab’ing build teams over the years:

  • Student choice works well but can also tank a project. I want there to be a healthy amount of student choice and my guidance in assigning build teams. I survey students before a project to find out their preference on team members, roles, content (often times that means: what community partner they work with), and time availability. After I get to learn everyone’s strengths, I usually assemble the team from the survey data. I also choose the PM. After that, the team makes the rest of the decisions themselves.
  • All of the projects my students work on are built in WordPress. I have usually required students to purchase self-hosted domains, but this semester I am exploring a Reclaim Domain that I’ve installed a multisite WordPress instance on, splitting off separate sites for each student.
  • It’s always best to let students see what build teams look like outside the classroom. I encourage students to volunteer for a 48in48 hackathon, and when they do, I give them time in class to describe the environment. Volunteering alongside tech industry professionals gives my students valuable exposure to values and skill-sets necessary for collaboration in digital careers.
  • Flexibility is important. Sometimes teams burn out, lose a member, or go off the rails. I give students a “failure is a learning moment” speech every semester, to try to inoculate them from the panic that sets in for some students when a project does not go exactly the way that they wanted it to. I encourage them to look at every collaborative project (I usually do around four) is an opportunity to learn a new skill in community with other people, and that sometimes that skill is supporting other team members through challenges.

Session Author(s):

pete.rorabaugh

Pete Rorabaugh

Session Resources:

Comments Archive

reclaimhosting: Welcome to the Chat
Jim Groom: I like this collaborative model and I'm sure the students appreciate building something tangible as part of the course. How do you setup the community partners, and what kind of projects have the students worked on this far?
Cogdog: Just getting my first read in! Hi Pete
Cogdog: What is the time that students in the class work on the project? Is it the hackathon 48 hours style or is it extended over time?
Cogdog: It reminds me @Jim how complicated and yet powerful were the DS106 group projects to produce a radio show- lots of roles to take and dynamics to sort out.
Cogdog: One favorite group at UMW did a show about a dysfunctional group project, it was rather meta. One person had the role of the person who only pretended to do work.
Mo Pelzel: Hey Pete ... I think we met at ET4Online in 2015 in Dallas ... wow, that was several worlds ago.
Mo Pelzel: BTW, that link to the WRIT 3152 site is not working for me..
Jim Groom: @Mo Try this https://peterorabaugh.org/pedagogy-2/designing-student-build-teams-for-reclaim-open-2025/
Cogdog: OMG I found that DS106 group project, Spring 2013 it was the "Dotcommers" group with "The Science of Group Projects" https://ds106.us/2013/03/21/ds106-show-week-9-radio-shows-live-and-web-storymaking/
Mo Pelzel: This is such a cool model ... one question I have is about the sustainability of the sites that are created after the course ends. Do the community partners take that over completely and, if so, how are they trained for that?
Alexis Block: I LOVE this idea! As an educator myself, defining the roles for a group project seems like such an obvious step that many (including myself) look over, but could be critical to success! I also love the idea of a project being rooted in real world community. In the CU Boulder community, we always tried to talk around the idea of "disposable" and "non-disposable" assignments, this feels like a great contribution to the latter
Mo Pelzel: That works ... thanks @Jim
Jim Groom: Also, fixed the link in the main site, so thanks for heads up
pete: @jim .. i have been developing rships with non profits in atlanta for one-off internship opps for a couple of years .. but i get a lot of connections from 48in48 (they act as a hub bringing in 150 new non profits every year).
pete: @jim projects: i assign them a host of different varieties of "reports" trying to approximate a product that they would be completing if they were doing digital strategy consulting .. audit report, case study, guidance doc .. all within a WP shell
pete: @alan it's over an extended amount of time (over the whole semester) .. the collaborative projects get larger and more detailed throughout the semester .. this week they are finishing up their third (audit teams) and starting their fourth (case study) that will take us through the end of the semester.
Mark: I love this project based learning model!
pete: @mo .. yes, we DID meet in dallas .. i remember your last name vividly (also, i think alan and jr dingwall were at that conference as well) .. just fixed the link, thanks for the heads up.
pete: @mo the work has been done on student domains (which, as we all know, don't live long, most of them) .. but now that ive switched over to having them be splits of my cloud domain, they will live longer .. i share the products with the community partners so that they can benefit from the advice .. it's a pretty standard service model component, like students giving cheap haircuts outside of a barber school :)
Mo Pelzel: @pete ... yeah, jr was there ... and @jimgroom keynoted.
Christina H: test
Christina H: testing!
pete: she lives!!
Pilot: I would have loved to be part of a course like this, with this sort of structure, when I was a student. Really cool to see you break down the responsibilities of each role so clearly. I'm sure that also helps students feel much more confident since they really understand the expectations
Christina H: This is a great project! I really appreciate how you've divided up the different roles, which provides students some choice in what they want to learn/practice, and also demonstrates that many different kinds of skills and activities are needed for this sort of project. I also love the 48in48 idea...hadn't heard of that before!
pete: thanks for the encouragement y'all .. here's what a discrete assignment looks like for one of these projects that involves roles: https://classes.peterorabaugh.org/writ3152/audit-team-assignment/
Cogdog: @pete and @mo I think I was virtual that year, but they blur together now. I can only be sure if I can find an old blog post of flickr photo.
pete: @alan (queue junk drawer theme music)
Cogdog: https://classes.peterorabaugh.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/my-life-through-a-lens-bq31L0jQAjU-unsplash.jpg
Christina H: I just went to my blog to confirm that I was at ET4Online in 2015 as well. 10 years ago!
Cogdog: Exploring the full archive of class posts, great materials pete https://classes.peterorabaugh.org/category/writ3152/
pete: y'all, we are old .. christina, maybe that was the one that you, me, jr, and andrea presented at? on twitter v. zombies?
Christina H: Yep, TvsZ that year
pete: thanks alan .. that classes. subdomain is like everything i have assigned to students (and kept off of our lms!) for more than a decade :)
Christina H: And agree with @Alan, great archive of your course materials and class posts, Pete. Such a good example of open practice so others can learn and be inspired!
Cogdog: Nope I am wrong, I was there at ET4Online, here is a photo of Christina and JR Dingwall https://www.flickr.com/photos/cogdog/17261401481/
pete: that's kind y'all, thanks .. most of what's visible is just materials from this semester .. imagine who many posts are sitting there having been moved to "draft" after the semester is over :)
pete: @alan .. i mean, i knew you were there .. but i do remember that picture .. they look so cute and shiny.
Cogdog: For the wayback, I ran a project at Maricopa in the 1990s called Studio 1151 where we had teams of students work with faculty on a web project.
Cogdog: It was modeled after the way movies were made, with lots of riles, eah "team" had to report to the "Studio" on their progress https://mcli.cogdogblog.com/authoring/studio/
Mo Pelzel: @Christina ... yes! TvsZ ... and later that year I was part of your #TWP15 project (Teaching with WordPress)
pete: @alan i love the simplicity of design in that project description.
Christina H: Oh right, I knew I recognized your name from more than a conference, Mo!
Christina H: Thinking about your build teams, @Pete, I love that the researcher is someone with the "license to go down every rabbit hole." There are some folks (like me!) who would absolutely thrive with that.
pete: @christina .. yeah, there are some really good researchers .. but sometimes people "hide out" in the researcher role.
Mark: @pete Thanks for all the useful ideas. And to all for thier input and links.
pete: @mark happy that it was useful for you :)